Chris Williamson · the podbrain notes ·
14 min read

Alison Armstrong - How to Treat Men Better

The episode features Alison Armstrong, relationship expert and author of The Queen's Code, who has spent over 30 years studying men and male-female dynamics since February 1991.

Chris Williamson Chris Williamson
Subscribe to Notes Upgrade
Chris Williamson episode thumbnail: Alison Armstrong - How to Treat Men Better
Chris Williamson
Key Takeaways
  1. 01

    "Men marry women they know they can make happy" - Alison, emphasizing that men prioritize their ability to provide happiness over romantic love alone

  2. 02

    Women operate from "justified and reasonable" to "entitled and deserved" when expressing needs, while about half of men view having needs as "weak and pathetic"

  3. 03

    Emasculation occurs through withholding quality information, interrupting focus, and criticizing - all of which trigger men to shift from provide mode to protect mode

  4. 04

    "Single focus is peace" for men - their brains are designed to screen out irrelevant information, creating a state of calm through commitment to one thing

  5. 05

    Women's peripheral vision and constant safety monitoring create a "feel-safe" orientation, while men operate from fact-based security through productivity and resources

  6. 06

    The four most charming qualities in women according to men: self-confidence, authenticity/courage, passion outside the relationship, and receptivity to what men want to give

  7. 07

    Happiness for women requires both having enough of what they need AND engaging in fulfilling activities - 90-95% of what makes women happy is up to them

  8. 08

    "Femininity is a gift to women from men" - women can only access feminine energy when they allow themselves to be protected and entrust men with accountability

Get the latest ideas from Chris Williamson.

Plus the best new takeaways about relationships from other top podcasts — read in minutes, not hours.

or

By continuing, you agree to podbrain's Terms and Privacy Policy.

These notes may contain occasional inaccuracies. Learn how podbrain notes are made

The episode features Alison Armstrong, relationship expert and author of The Queen's Code, who has spent over 30 years studying men and male-female dynamics since February 1991.

Armstrong discusses her paradigm-based approach to relationships, focusing on reverse engineering how different worldviews make certain outcomes easy or impossible, particularly around gender dynamics.

The conversation explores fundamental differences between men and women in communication, needs expression, and relationship priorities, including the 12 factors men consider when choosing a life partner.

Host Chris Williamson guides the discussion through topics including emasculation, the role of appreciation, evolutionary psychology of mate selection, and practical strategies for improving cross-gender understanding and collaboration.

The Paradigm Approach to Relationships

Armstrong's work centers on exposing and reverse engineering paradigms - understanding how each worldview makes certain things easy or impossible, then trading paradigms to access different results.

"If the results that you want are impossible in the paradigm you're operating in, get a new one, invent a new one, and even trade them out" - Alison, describing her fundamental approach to transformation.

Armstrong discovered in February 1991 that she was "bringing out the worst" in men, which became the catalyst for three decades of studying male psychology and behavior patterns.

The work emphasizes precision and potency in language, with strategic use of generalization to help people find themselves in the concepts, balancing specificity with accessibility.

Women's Drive to Please vs Men's Priorities

Women are "terrified of being displeasing" due to evolutionary survival instincts - as the smaller, weaker gender, they developed hypersensitivity to men's reactions and preferences.

"The cave woman within has been tracking you since the moment you walked through the door" - Alison, describing women's constant monitoring of men's pleasure and displeasure cues.

Women mistakenly believe men will only protect women they're pleased by, creating anxiety around any perceived displeasure or conflict.

Men would rather be empowered or admired than pleased - being pleased ranks low in male priorities compared to feeling capable, respected, and accepted.

Women expect men to track preferences, hear hints as requests, and interpret criticism as actionable feedback - but these don't connect to men's "action command center" at all.

Safety vs Security: Fundamental Gender Difference

Women constantly monitor "feel-safe" (emotional, connection-based), while men focus on fact-based security through resources, track record, connections, and influence.

"How many women does it take to make you feel as safe as one man you know is for you? There is no number" - Alison, from informal surveys conducted over 20 years.

Estrogen creates different vision in women - gathering vision with constant peripheral monitoring versus men's hunting vision with single-focus tracking ability.

Studies show the faster an object moves, the bigger the difference between men's and women's ability to track it, affecting everything from driving perception to spatial awareness.

Women feel safe through connection and resonance, trusting connection far more than they should - "we think it should count for more than it does."

The 12 Factors Men Consider for Commitment

Love and connection don't appear in men's list of 12 commitment factors - "men are so much smarter about commitment than women are" despite being accused of being non-committal.

Factor 1: Doesn't emasculate him too much (threshold changes from prince stage to king stage of life).

Factor 2: She genuinely likes him, not just loves him.

Factor 3: Sex - enough communication and exploration that he believes he could do this with one person for life, with sufficient variety built in.

Factor 4: He thinks he can give her what he thinks she needs (how he determines her needs is complex and often inaccurate).

Factor 5: Their values and origins are compatible or complementary, not necessarily identical.

Factor 6: Their futures are headed in the same direction.

Factor 7: Communication is productive - solves problems, identifies issues, keeps them on the same team. "When there's a problem, she doesn't make me the problem."

Factor 8: She's attractive to him - both sexually attractive and he's charmed and enchanted by her in ways women wildly underestimate.

Factor 10: He knows he can make her happy - "Men don't marry women that they love but they know they can't make her happy."

The Four Most Charming Qualities in Women

Self-confidence tops the list universally - men consistently say "it's probably different for other men, but for me, it's self-confidence" then all agree it's self-confidence.

Authenticity and courage - "when she has the courage to be direct, when she has the courage to speak up" rather than pretending to be pleasing.

"So much of being a woman is about pretense. We're literally taught to pretend in order to be pleasing" - from push-up bras to laughing at unfunny jokes.

Passion for something outside the relationship - "she's got to have something outside of me, outside of us that feeds her" so she brings something to the partnership.

Being with a passionate woman causes measurable testosterone spikes in men - "it can be measured" that men experience well-being hormone increases around women's passion.

Receptivity is the fourth and most difficult quality - the first three make men want to give, but without receptivity, "she's caused him to want to give and then she's like, No, I don't need that."

Sexual Attraction vs Being Charmed

Sexual attraction (shiny hair, shapely body, sensuality, sexual energy) makes men want to take, while charming qualities make men want to give.

"Sexual energy is the energy a woman puts out when she wants to put out" - it antagonizes the most primitive instinct on the planet, creating impulse override tension.

Men's bodies shake with "impulse override" like a trained dog resisting the urge to jump - "not caring can feel like freedom" but also "I have no purpose, my life is shit."

Women feel safe around gay men because "there's no override, there's no vibration, there's no tension" - highlighting how much straight men are constantly managing primitive impulses.

Women exacerbate difficulty by leading with sexual attraction while not understanding that charming qualities are what cause men to care and commit.

Complementary Strength and Mate Selection

Both men and women constantly scan for strength, but men specifically search for complementary strength that "literally altered the possibilities of his own game."

"Tom Brady is not looking for another all-star quarterback. Tom Brady's looking for a Jerry Rice" - Alison, explaining men seek partners whose strengths enhance their own.

Women don't know they've been picked for complementary strength, then attack men for not having the same strengths women have - "like Tom Brady being pissed at Jerry Rice that he can't throw a ball."

"It's intoxicating in a good way to be admired by someone you admire" - but women criticize men for not being like them instead of appreciating complementary strengths.

Assignment given to woman who claimed she'd never met a man stronger than her: "How is this man strong? How is this man stronger than me? How is this man stronger than me and I like it?"

Women's brains are wired to find flaws and imperfections, while men are fed by beauty and can find beauty in anyone without perfection.

The Problem with Trust and Needs

Women want blanket trust - "if I trust you, that means you're going to meet every expectation of mine" including unstated expectations men never agreed to fulfill.

Armstrong's proposal: "You can trust everyone if you pay attention to what you can trust them for" - trust is specific, not blanket.

"I could trust my husband to eat chocolate" - six and a half years after his death, mice still find Hershey's wrappers in his office, illustrating specific trustworthiness.

Men care about women's needs and want to provide what women need, but "they don't know what we need. They think they know what we need" and project their own needs.

Women often don't know what they need themselves - Armstrong developed a method: figure out what quality you want to be, then determine what you need to be that way.

When asked why she hadn't told her boyfriend what she needed, woman replied "because I can't" - leading to discovery of six different points of view about what it means to need something.

The Spectrum of Needs and Expression

Spectrum of need perspectives: weak/pathetic → unevolved/immature → justified/reasonable → entitled/deserved, with "here for a reason" in between.

Most women live in "justified and reasonable" to "entitled and deserved" - needs must travel the whole spectrum to be expressed, many never make the trip.

About half of men's primary reaction to having needs is "weak and pathetic" - they just don't need anything, like Superman who never eats or sleeps.

"The warrior's never gonna reveal a weakness, never ever. It'll be used against you" - men are built to not reveal anything that can be weaponized.

"There's a nobility in stifling desires" - Chris, identifying how men frame suppressing needs as virtuous rather than acknowledging underlying fear.

Needs that don't reach "entitled and deserved" may surface as complaints, but "a complaint is not an ask" - women expect complaints to trigger action without direct requests.

How Women Train Men Not to Open Up

Women betray men's intimate revelations by sharing them with others - "for a woman that an admirable man revealed something to me makes me important" through status/herd instinct.

"It's only worth something if I can tell someone else about it" - women don't realize sharing intimate information is betrayal from men's perspective.

Women use revealed information against men in arguments, proving the warrior instinct right that vulnerability will be weaponized.

Armstrong created webinar titled Why Men Can't Be Trusted to attract women, then revealed the real issue: women's reactions train men to lie.

When men tell truth, women respond with "you shouldn't think that, you shouldn't feel that way, that's wrong" - training men that truth causes displeasure and therefore danger.

"She doesn't need to know that" becomes men's mantra after being trained that honesty creates problems rather than solving them.

Lying as Natural Survival Instinct

"Lying is completely natural" - observed in children, horses, dogs, all species as fundamental survival behavior through fight/flight/freeze responses.

If lying is natural, "how do you get honesty? You have to celebrate it" - Armstrong fires people for lying about lying, not for the original lie.

"I love you, admire you, and adore you for telling me the truth. I'll get over the hurt feelings. Just give me a minute" - the formula for encouraging continued honesty.

Armstrong's partner Dan asked if she was self-conscious while getting naked - she admitted feeling "chubby" and he responded "I was just checking," demonstrating celebrated honesty.

Dan's superpower is acceptance - "he's a genius at acceptance" with attitude of "yes, I'm perfectly imperfect, so are you, we all are perfectly imperfect."

When men commit, they "buy the whole package" including flaws, while women "commit one acceptance at a time" and may never fully accept after 30 years of marriage.

Understanding and Preventing Emasculation

Dictionary definition: "to deprive of virility" - but Armstrong expanded understanding over 30+ years to include anything that diminishes ability to produce results.

"Feeling bad does not emasculate me" - Tomer, distinguishing between hurt feelings and actual emasculation, leading to productivity vs connectivity framework.

Everybody emasculates everybody - "men naturally emasculate men" through competition in business and war, both honorably and dishonorably.

Withholding quality information is emasculating - not speaking up, not exposing needs, not being authentic all diminish men's ability to provide effectively.

Interrupting men's focus is highly emasculating - "single focus is peace" for men, and interruption "blew it up, ran the train off the track."

Women interrupt constantly because estrogen creates brains in "constant state of interruption" monitoring multiple things - they don't understand interruption until hormones change around age 50.

The "green emasculations" are low-energy withholding: quality information, attention, affection, admiration, accountability, even food - "just watch him power down, don't feed him."

The "C" emasculations: criticize, compare, complain, and backhanded compliments like "finally, you're so rare" which insults the entire gender.

Worst emasculation: "Be a better man" - women who are sure "they are the best men they've ever met" can "take out a whole room just walking in."

The Emasculation Framework: Triggers and Justifications

All emasculation triggers boil down to fear and frustration - these two emotions drive women to diminish men's power and capability.

Women justify emasculation through beliefs like "they abuse power," "they can't be trusted," "they don't do anything right," or "men are stupid."

Armstrong's mother's justification was "men are stupid" - despite being married to multiple intelligent men, she couldn't access their unique intelligence because she measured it against her own.

Friend's justification "they have too much power and they abuse it" meant "she could never avail themselves of their intelligence" - the justification prevented the benefit.

Some women believe "if they never give up the happy, you'll keep trying harder" - backwards logic that prevents men from knowing how to increase happiness.

When women achieve happiness, they often ensure men know "it wasn't you" - attributing success to career, personal achievement, or others, asking "why can't you just be happy for me?"

What Men Value Most: Being Taken Care Of

Being taken care of ranks far higher than being pleased - "how much more productive can a man be if he's being taken care of?"

Taking care of, support, and appreciation "all live in the same domain" - what you appreciate, you take care of and support.

Men say "I feel appreciated when" in response to "how do you feel supported?" and "I feel supported when" in response to "how do you like to be appreciated?" - the concepts are interchangeable.

Armstrong's best birthday gift at 65: three days home alone while her partner attended Father's Weekend with his son at CU Boulder - supporting what mattered most to him.

"The most important thing to him in his life is his children" - Armstrong identified this in first three hours of phone conversation, making it her priority to support.

Women mistakenly want to be men's first priority - "if he makes you his first priority, he will drive you nuts" because men's capacities are enormous and would overwhelm one person.

The Three Essences of an Attractive Man

From Dr. Robert Glover's No More Mr. Nice Guy: comfortable in his own skin, knows where he's going, having fun while going there.

Armstrong's late husband Greg was "not comfortable in his own skin" - felt trapped in a human body that was "too heavy, too slow, just a burden."

When Greg died suddenly, Armstrong "felt his exhilaration. He was free" of the body he found burdensome, making grief "really hard to grieve in a normal way."

"Men at play is when we fall in love with you" - women fall for men having fun with open state of mind, but if men are always that way, "you're not strong enough to save me from the tiger."

Men need something they're up to outside the relationship - "that's hot, what you're up to" creates attraction and prevents suffocating focus on partner.

Happiness: The Ultimate Bullseye for Men

"Happy is the bullseye" - making a woman happy is "victory on so many levels" and the highest points a man can earn.

"Happy wife, happy life" represents success at what men do plus wife obviously happy with him - "he's a rock star" in all domains.

90-95% of what it takes for a woman to be happy is up to her - men can't make women happy if women aren't doing their part.

Happiness requires two axes: vertical axis is having enough of what you need (sleep, food, attention, alone time), horizontal is engaging in fulfilling activities.

Only the upper right quadrant allows happiness - having more than enough needs met AND engaged in fulfilling activities, otherwise stuck in sympathetic nervous system.

"Happiness is radioactive" - tiny amounts create huge effects once needs are met, women can get happy just from planning to do something fulfilling.

"Moment of ecstasy" when big happy happens - feeling radiates from center down arms and legs, creates "little happy dance" that makes "every man in the vicinity" want to build or kill something.

Women emasculate by ensuring men know "it wasn't you" when happy - attributing happiness to career or others instead of acknowledging partner's contribution, even patience.

Evolutionary Psychology and Mate Value

Imbalance in perceived mate value creates two mating strategies: benefit-affording (deepening connection through giving more) and cost-inflicting (pulling partner down through criticism).

Cost-inflicting strategy manifests as "no one's ever going to want you," cutting off from friends, passive-aggressive comments to erode self-image.

Human babies evolved to look like their fathers initially (about 80% similarity) to increase male parental investment by reducing paternity uncertainty.

Over time, children's faces change to look more like mothers - beauty comes from the female in most species, providing evolutionary advantage to offspring.

"Sexy son hypothesis" - women assess attractive men not just for genetic quality but because attractive sons will have mating advantages in next generation.

Humans are "grandchildren optimizing machines" according to Steve Stewart Williams in The Ape that Understood the Universe - all behavior optimizes for grandchildren production.

Charles Darwin's most painful child loss was around age 11 - the grandchildren optimizing machine was about to start producing but was lost at that threshold.

Fundamental Survival Instincts: Me vs Not-Me

"The basis of the immune system is discerning me and not me" - sneeze, cough, diarrhea are all "not-me reactions" to eject what doesn't belong.

Humans have identical "not-me" reactions to other people - constantly scanning "are you me or not me?" and assigning too much meaning to similarities.

"You're like me, so I'm safe and you're going to be like me in other ways" - produces instant but overestimated connection based on surface similarities.

Women seek men who are like them, creating confusion because "chemistry is caused by differences" - trying to prove equality eliminates attraction.

Men lean into differences - "I don't want to be with someone who's like me. I don't need another me. I want someone who's not like me."

Picking up accents is survival mechanism - "if I talk like you, you won't kill me" - passing as part of the group through mimicry.

Trauma can cross-wire the instinct - some people know "if you're like me, you're dangerous" because they recognize their own danger in others.

Trim Tabs: Small Changes, Massive Impact

Buckminster Fuller's trim tab concept: small rudder on main rudder that uses current to move massive ship with minimal energy - Armstrong's "addiction."

Women who want men to open up should not interrupt - "when he pauses, count to 30" because most men will come in at about 18 seconds unless discussing feelings.

"Don't ever ask a question that isn't worth waiting for the answer" - women start waiting, men start talking, then women complain men don't reciprocate listening.

Men show appreciation by taking/consuming what's offered (talking because you listened, eating the sandwich, responding to nakedness), not through direct reciprocity.

Women expect direct reciprocity - "I listened to you for 27 minutes. Now you listen to me for 27 minutes" with internal ticker tracking balance.

Instead of "let's do it," men should add details: "I'd like you to feel, I want to make you feel things you've never felt before. How soon can you be in the bed?"

Say "could you help me with a problem?" instead of "we need to talk about this issue" - issues are by definition insolvable, problems invite hero response.

The Queen's Code is structured as "fairy trap" - story and context prevent women from gleaning information to use against men, forcing transformation of perspective.

The Worth It Calculation and Feelings Like Love

Armstrong's recent event Feels Like Love Looks Like Math explores how what feels like love is always something someone does, says, remembers, or spends energy on.

The "worth it calculation" has three phases: pre-calculation (estimated effort), ongoing (is this taking more than expected?), and post-calculation (was it worth it?).

Men constantly pay attention to worth it calculation due to awareness of time, energy, and resources - must save for winter, ROI must be high.

Women have connection to eternal - "in eternity, there's all the time in the world, so why not fold the laundry?" Almost everything is worth doing if slightly worthwhile.

"There's so many things that women want from men, but they don't make it worth men doing. They don't provide" the appreciation or recognition that makes effort worthwhile.

Deserving plus appreciation together create the worth it calculation - thinking someone deserves something doesn't make it happen without making the effort worthwhile.

Where Men Experience Emotions in Their Bodies

Armstrong distinguishes emotion (energy in motion like fear moving through body) from feelings (which have specific locations in the body).

Women have feelings stacked "like a condo complex" in their chest - "you hurt my feelings" (plural) because multiple feelings exist in one location.

Men couldn't answer "where do you feel happiness?" because they pay attention to women being happy, not themselves being happy - "they just are when they are."

Men experience happiness in neck thickening and chest swelling - shoulders and arms where they also experience power, their body's strongest part.

When admired by someone they admire, men show subtle response - slight movement, barely perceptible acknowledgment, must "watch so closely" to see it mattered.

"Where you guys feel happiness is also where you experience power" - happiness and power are intertwined in the same physical location.

"What are women terrified of? Power" - women emasculate men when they feel happy and empowered, attacking at moments of victory due to fear of male power.

Chris Williamson
From Chris Williamson. Get a note like this from every new episode.
Subscribe to Notes Upgrade

These notes may contain occasional inaccuracies. Learn how podbrain notes are made

0 / 0
Link copied