Get the latest ideas from Unchained.
Plus the best new takeaways about bitcoin from other top podcasts — read in minutes, not hours.
or
By continuing, you agree to podbrain's Terms and Privacy Policy.
The Chopping Block hosts Tom Schmidt (DeFi Maven), Tarun Chitra (Gauntlet), and Haseeb Qureshi (Dragonfly) are joined by Justin Drake, Beacon Chain researcher at the Ethereum Foundation and co-author of Google's recent quantum cryptography paper.
The conversation begins with John Carreyrou's latest investigative piece claiming Satoshi Nakamoto is Adam Back, drawing parallels to his Theranos exposé detailed in Bad Blood. The hosts discuss the stylometric analysis and circumstantial evidence presented, with mixed reactions to the claims.
The discussion then shifts to quantum computing threats, covering Google's breakthrough paper showing dramatic improvements in Shor's algorithm efficiency, the timeline for quantum computers capable of breaking cryptocurrency security, and the industry's varied responses to these developments.
The episode concludes with analysis of the Drift protocol hack involving sophisticated North Korean social engineering and Anthropic's Mythos Preview model, which demonstrated unprecedented cybersecurity attack capabilities but won't be publicly released.
John Carreyrou Claims Adam Back is Satoshi Nakamoto
John Carreyrou, known for exposing Theranos in Bad Blood, published a detailed investigation claiming Satoshi Nakamoto is Adam Back based on stylometric analysis and circumstantial evidence.
The evidence includes similar offline periods, shared interests in libertarianism and specific technical topics, and matching British writing patterns including hyphenation and ending sentences with 'also'.
"I would also be very disappointed if Satoshi was Adam Back... I just think he has wrong takes. For example, on quantum" - Justin, citing Back's belief that quantum computers are 20+ years away.
The hosts express skepticism about the investigation's methodology, noting the initial stylometric analysis was inconclusive and Carreyrou manually constructed decision trees to reach his preferred conclusion.
Google's Quantum Breakthrough Cuts Required Qubits by 20x
Google's paper, co-authored by Justin Drake, demonstrates Shor's algorithm improvements requiring only 500,000 physical qubits to break ECDSA-256 in 9 minutes, down from millions previously estimated.
Oratomic's neutral atoms approach shows even greater efficiency at 26,000 qubits but requires 10 days for the attack, representing different quantum architecture trade-offs.
"Historically, when you look at Shor's algorithm, it's been heavily optimized over the last two decades. In 2014, we were talking about a billion qubits... Now we're talking about less than a million" - Justin.
Google used ZK proofs via SP1 to demonstrate knowledge of the quantum circuit without releasing the actual implementation, citing government pressure and security concerns.
The papers establish a 2029 timeline for viable quantum computers, though Justin notes "more likely than not, we're looking at post-2030" for actual deployment.
Bitcoin's Quantum Denialism vs Ethereum's Preparation
"Bitcoin has this culture of trying to get rid of FUD... but for some cases where it's actually not FUD, it's some sort of autoimmune disease" - Justin on Bitcoin community's quantum skepticism.
One-third of Bitcoin's supply has exposed public keys vulnerable to quantum attacks, with Satoshi's ~1 million coins presenting the biggest economic challenge requiring either burning or market absorption.
Ethereum faces technical complexity with cryptography embedded throughout smart contracts, multisigs, and admin keys, but Justin advocates maintaining "hard property rights" rather than interventionist approaches.
Post-quantum signatures are 10x larger than ECDSA (666 bytes vs 64 bytes), requiring signature aggregation to prevent Bitcoin dropping from 3 TPS to 0.3 TPS.
"Ironically, for Bitcoiners, moving to post-quantum cryptography will be a scalability increase because they'll save the half megabyte from the ECDSA signatures" - Justin.
Drift's $285M Hack: North Korean Social Engineering
Drift lost $285 million in 12 minutes through a sophisticated attack involving six months of in-person relationship building by a quant trading firm later attributed to North Korea.
The attackers met Drift team at conferences, deposited $1 million, and built trust before delivering malware through a malicious VS Code repository that executed arbitrary code silently.
The attack exploited a 2-of-5 multisig with no timelock, allowing immediate changes to collateral properties of a fake token to borrow all available assets.
"Any EDR solution would have caught this attack because this thing was clearly very invasive malware" - the hosts note basic enterprise security would have prevented the technical compromise.
Anthropic's Mythos: The AI Security Apocalypse
Anthropic's unreleased Mythos Preview model found vulnerabilities in every major operating system and browser, including a 27-year-old OpenBSD bug, with 80%+ success rates.
"The GEF team is receiving about 10 security reports per day, about one of which is valid... some of the reports are critical things that have been in the code base for roughly a decade" - Justin.
Project Glasswing restricts Mythos access to vetted enterprises including AWS, Apple, Google, and Microsoft, providing $100 million in free compute to harden their software.
Justin warns of potential "post-AI" cryptographic threats: "AI is becoming extremely good at mathematics... it's not implausible that an elliptic curve could have some mathematical shortcut to solve the discrete log problem."
The solution path involves formal verification where "not only the software has no bugs, but you also have a proof that there are no bugs, which is the ultimate endgame" - Justin.
From Unchained. Get a note like this from every new episode.